Overcoming Obstacles to State Authorization of Transmission
MCLI Recommendation: “Congress could enact new legislation to transfer siting approval and eminent domain authority for interstate electric transmission lines from the states to FERC, DOE, or another federal agency.”
LPDD Recommendation: “Congress could create multistate regional siting authorities to approve interstate transmission lines within a region. In areas where RTOs currently exist, an RTO could potentially serve in the role of a regional siting authority for interstate transmission lines. In areas where RTOs do not exist, states could use existing authority under EPAct 2005 to enter into interstate compacts that would create regional siting authorities to approve interstate transmission lines within their collective state footprints.”
LPDD Recommendation: “Congress could direct DOE to create more national interest electric transmission corridors (NIETCs).”
LPDD Recommendation: “Congress could expand DOE’s authority under EPAct 2005 to partner with private transmission line companies in areas beyond the Western Area Power Administration and the Southwestern Power Administration.”
LPDD Recommendation: “Congress could leave siting authority for interstate transmission lines with the states but require that states consider regional and national electricity needs, including decarbonization goals, in making siting decisions and allowing a federal remedy in court for failure to comply.”
LPDD Recommendation: “Congress could revise EPAct 2005 to clarify that FERC has authority to grant siting permits for transmission lines within NIETCs if a state has denied a siting permit for the line.”
LPDD Recommendation: “State legislatures could amend existing laws to direct their state PUCs to consider regional and national need as well as clean energy goals in determining whether there is a ‘need’ for a transmission line that will impact the state. To the extent state law sets out what is a ‘public use’ for purposes of eminent domain authority, state legislatures could amend the law to make clear that public use includes benefits to a multi-state region as well as to the individual state.”
LPDD Recommendation: “State legislatures could make clear that merchant transmission line companies can seek siting permits and exercise eminent domain authority under the same conditions as electric utilities.”
Filter by
No resource type matches that.
No jurisdictional level matches that.
21 resources
Texas’ Competitive Renewable Energy Zones
The Texas Public Utility Commission is responsible for designating “competitive renewable energy zones” and “develop[ing] a plan to construct transmission capacity necessary to deliver to electric cus...
Great Plains Institute report, Opportunities to enable interstate coordination & cooperation in support of transmission infrastructure build-out in the Midwest
A 2011 Great Plain Institute report surveys key actions and policy mechanisms for supporting interstate coordination and cooperation to achieve transmission infrastructure, and includes model language...
California Law Expediting Transmission Permitting
In September, 2023, California passed a law making transmission projects eligible for status as “environmental leadership development projects,” which would require state agencies to resolve environme...
DOE’s Grid Modernization Initiative’s 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review
The DOE’s Grid Modernization Initiative’s 2015 Quadrennial Technology Review provides a survey of the state of the nation’s interconnected grids, the challenges to achieving higher renewable penetrati...
Michigan’s Clean, Renewable, and Efficient Energy Act
Michigan’s 2008 Clean, Renewable, and Efficient Energy Act called for the mapping of “Wind Energy Resource Zones” where transmission lines would be subject to an expedited siting process.
FERC Order 1000
FERC Order 1000 imposed on all public utility electric transmission providers the need to develop regional transmission plans. Those plans must consider non-transmission options as well as transmissio...
Proposed American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009
The proposed American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009 would have replaced state transmission siting altogether with regional siting entities operating in conjunction with the Department of the Int...
Telecommunications Act of 1996
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 provides a useful model for how Congress or states might overcome local governments obstructing the authorization of transmission. It imposed constraints on the appr...
New Mexico’s Renewable Energy Transmission Authority Act
New Mexico’s Renewable Energy Transmission Authority Act (2007) directed the state’s Renewable Energy Transmission Authority to participate in regional transmission forums and grants it the power of e...
Proposed Clean Renewable Energy and Economic Development Act of 2009
The proposed Clean Renewable Energy and Economic Development Act of 2009 would have allowed DOE to designate “national renewable energy zones,” based on locations that are capable of generating more t...
Minnesota Energy Infrastructure Permitting Act
The Minnesota Energy Infrastructure Permitting Act, signed in May 2024, consolidates and reforms Minnesota’s review and permitting process for energy generation, storage, and transmission projects. Br...
Report, Building a New Grid Without New Legislation: A Path to Revitalizing Federal Transmission Authorities
This 2020 report from the Institute for Policy Integrity holds that, in the absence of legislation, critical long-distance transmission can be developed by applying existing federal legal authorities....
Bipartisan Policy Center report, Policies for a Modern and Reliable U.S. Electric Grid
The Bipartisan Policy Center released a 2013 report proposing a new federal backstop siting authority for transmission, allowing FERC to approve multistate transmission projects if a state siting auth...
MISO Multi-Value Project lines
The Midcontinent Independent System Operator had undertaken efforts to coordinate states to build a series of Multi-Value Project (MVP) lines (explained in a 2017 programmatic triennial review) design...
California Laws on Transmission Approvals and Reporting
In September, 2022, California enrolled two laws related to accelerating transmission approvals and reporting requirements.SB 529: California’s SB 529 requires the Public Utilities Commission to updat...
Energy Policy Act §216(i)
In the Energy Policy Act of 2005, §216(i) (codified at 16 U.S.C.A. § 824p), Congress granted consent for three or more contiguous States to enter into an interstate compact, subject to approval by Con...
Proposed American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009
The proposed American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (“Waxman-Markey”) would have endorsed a regional transmission planning model and the expansion of federal backstop authority over transmissi...
LPDD Model Law: State Law Expediting the Siting of Utility-Scale Renewable Energy Generating Systems
This model state legislation aims to expedite and institutionalize uniform processes for siting facilities for generating, transporting and storing renewable energy. The model statute has two parallel...
Proposed CLEAN Future Act (2020)
The proposed Climate Leadership and Environmental Action for our Nation’s (CLEAN) Future Act (2020) is a large, economy-wide climate bill released by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Among ...
California’s Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative
California’s Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative is a statewide attempt to overcome problems related to transmission planning and costs, private and public land use issues, and environmental impa...
Energy Policy Act of 2005
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 provides a useful model for how Congress or states might overcome local governments obstructing the permitting of transmission. Its provisions on the siting of liquefied ...
No resource matches the filters you selected.
This is the filter, not the topic: clear it to see all 21 resources under Overcoming Obstacles to State Authorization of Transmission.